This has been heavy on my heart the last several months, but especially today. Is it really asking so much to find someone who's consistent on life issues, standing up for the unborn as well as those sentenced to death in prison when more and more scientific evidence brings to light the large number of those falsely convicted to death in our country? Is it really so Biblically inconsistent to want to act responsibly toward our environment? And can I please have a Christian besides my husband who's not against same sex marriages?
Can we work on a little rehab and grace toward those stuck in the welfare system? Can we realize that forcing public prayer, making loving relationships illegal b/c of sexual orientation and killing fellow sinners is not going to win the hearts of individuals nor is it biblically consistent. God clearly states we aren't to associate with believers who live certain lives, but in the same passage He just as clearly states we aren't to judge those outside the church. It seems we are so busy judging the actions of non-believers we're forgetting the God who loved us while we were still sinners and who spent his time on earth dining with whores, deceivers and the carnal? God associates the pointing finger and malicious talk with the yoke of oppression he tells us to get rid of. We're not told to give to the worthy hungry, the worthy naked & the worthy wandering. We're simply told to give. Will not a hot drink and a listening ear open up an oppressed heart much faster than laws, prisons and haughty eyes?
As our nation votes today in these historic primaries I'm frustrated but not angry. I'm not bitter, reactionary, or simply anti-establishment as some believe. I honestly have tears in my eyes as I see God's heart when I read this chapter lately. Call me pregnant and hormonal but I'm sad. I'm simply and purely sad.
For day after day they seek me out;
they seem eager to know my ways,
as if they were a nation that does what is right
and has not forsaken the commands of its God.
They ask me for just decisions
and seem eager for God to come near them.
'Why have we fasted,' they say,
'and you have not seen it?
Why have we humbled ourselves,
and you have not noticed?'
"Yet on the day of your fasting, you do as you please
and exploit all your workers.
Your fasting ends in quarreling and strife,
and in striking each other with wicked fists.
You cannot fast as you do today
and expect your voice to be heard on high.
Is this the kind of fast I have chosen,
only a day for a man to humble himself?
Is it only for bowing one's head like a reed
and for lying on sackcloth and ashes?
Is that what you call a fast,
a day acceptable to the LORD ?
"Is not this the kind of fasting I have chosen:
to loose the chains of injustice
and untie the cords of the yoke,
to set the oppressed free
and break every yoke?
Is it not to share your food with the hungry
and to provide the poor wanderer with shelter—
when you see the naked, to clothe him,
and not to turn away from your own flesh and blood?
Then your light will break forth like the dawn,
and your healing will quickly appear;
then your righteousness [a] will go before you,
and the glory of the LORD will be your rear guard.
Then you will call, and the LORD will answer;
you will cry for help, and he will say: Here am I.
"If you do away with the yoke of oppression,
with the pointing finger and malicious talk,
and if you spend yourselves in behalf of the hungry
and satisfy the needs of the oppressed,
then your light will rise in the darkness,
and your night will become like the noonday.
http://www.biblegateway.com/topical/topical_searchresults.php?resultsapp=25&source=1&search=homosexual&searchtype=all
These are all the reasons a Christian should NOT support gay marriage. I believe it is a sin & a complete insult to the way God created marriage. Please, I'd like to hear your defense of gay marriage as a Christian.
Dear, Sweet Daughter –
I agree to an extent with your concern about capital punishment. I’ve long held – even before DNA testing – that wrongly convicted people are being executed for crimes they did not commit, and therefore there should be a much stronger standard of evidence before a sentence of capital punishment could be imposed. Instead of “beyond reasonable doubt,” it should be “beyond a shadow of a doubt.” But that doesn’t mean there aren’t criminals who are deserving of death for their crimes. And in this society, we certainly know that a criminal has time after his conviction to contemplate his crimes, repent, and turn to Christ.
I don’t understand, however, how you can position opposition to abortion as inconsistent with accepting capital punishment for correctly convicted murderers.
Our opinions separate a bit more on the homosexual marriage issue. First, a ban on homosexual marriage is not outlawing a loving relationship. It is instead avoiding institutionalizing and glorifying a sinful lifestyle. Marriage does that for a relationship – institutionalizes and glorifies that relationship, so I don’t see how a Christian can support the institutionalize and glorification of what is a sin. If the problem is that you do not believe that a homosexual relationship is sinful, then we haven’t been reading the same Bible, or you’ve also got to throw out idolatry, adultery, theft, greed, slander, and a multitude of other “alternative lifestyles.”
We are indeed told not to judge; we should approach each individual with an open, accepting attitude toward them, but we are also not to embrace their sin. Jesus didn’t tell the adulteress who was about to be stoned “Have a nice day, I enjoyed talking with you.” He said “Go, and sin no more” after those who had judged her were turned away by The Messiah’s words.
So we come to another area of agreement – we judge too harshly. We see their sin and feel shame about our own. We see the results of sinful behavior and react in sinful anger rather than righteous anger. We fail to reach out, to witness, to share, and are faced by our own sinful nature. We aren’t able to overcome our greed. Our sinful pride causes fear of being “taken” by someone who claims to be needy. But we’re not supposed to fear, to sin – we’re Christians. We should be stronger. We fail. Please don’t judge us too harshly.
gcw
Posted by: gcw at February 7, 2008 10:24 PMso, how do you feel about the National Deficit? This is something I've never thought of before. I found that I voted on the "morality" issues sometimes, but now I'm just sick of hearing the same old things. I am thankful for these primaries that I have gotten to hear different things. Things that are exciting.
Your dad is a wise man, I like how gently he approaches your opinion. I agree with him.
As I watch my neighborhood house very different people groups, and see the homeless visit our church several times a week, I wonder. Is welfare and charity working? What if, just what if the system was completely different? Cuz it's not working and we CANNOT afford it anymore. Where's the Dave Ramsey envelopes for our Federal Reserve?
Why can we not afford a welfare system but afford a senseless war? By the time it's over it's estimated to cost TRILLIONs of dollars.
All kinds of sins occur in a marriage between a man and wife, yet we continue to institutionalize it. Why should we deprive devoted partners the right to support each other because we look down upon their particular sin?
Lynn, have you read A New Kind of Christian by Brian McLaren or any of his other books? You might like him.
I'd love to write more but I really better go to work!
Posted by: Kristin at February 12, 2008 02:26 AMThat's certainly a valid point. If Christians want to see a change in the way society treats marriage, they could start by improving their own.... Reducing the divorce rate within the church would help, too.
However, Christians don't get married expecting never to sin. And God does not expect that, either. Part of His design for marriage involves the mutual edification of the couple through their individual relationships with God. And when there is sin in the Christian marriage, their commitment to God gives them not only the tools to deal with it, but also the hope for redemption that comes through His grace to them as believers. The problem is, this is not a hope that can be applied to a homosexual marriage, and it has nothing to do with looking down on one particular sin over the other. It's about not sending a mixed message to the unbeliever when we try to lead them to Christ.
This blog post was not a defense of the homosexual act, as much as it was a desire to separate the sin from the sinner in an effort to soften hearts and win souls. This is a good practice to be in, but even though we know all sins are equally damning in God's eyes, there must be an understanding that not all sins can be handled in the same way.
There's no question that many homosexual relationships are loving, caring, and supportive. But this doesn’t change the truth that the basic nature of that relationship cannot ever be pleasing to God. So what does it say to that couple if Christians encourage the homosexual marriage, get them to church, and then tell them they're sinning by doing what we encouraged? What should they do then? Divorce? At that point we've created an almost impossible catch-22 situation. Where's the hope in that?
Zeal for the lost is a quality that many Christians lack. But if our compassion ever causes us to water down God's truth, our message is lost and we've drawn them to nothing. There's no hope in a shaky message, and God has assured us that parts of the Gospel will be distasteful to the unbeliever. There is a great deal of freedom in that thought. We are to love the sinner and speak the truth. God draws the heart.
Just a note - I'm not ignoring y'all. It's just been one thing after another and I want to write a more extended entry to try and better explain my opinion. Hard to give it due time with what I call the "Knee Nipper Syndrome".
I appreciate those of you who have actually spoken to the subject. If I'm wrong I sure won't realize it without hearing from loving folks out there. And vice versa. :) Thoughtful, loving discussion will take us far.
Posted by: lynnp at February 12, 2008 03:21 PMAh, Soapbox Girl, you have a really good point. It would definitely send a mixed message if Christians were encouraging homosexual marriage. Perhaps, then, if we want to show homosexuals that we hate the sin but love the sinner we should support the idea of civil unions, but not sacred ones. This way we're not depriving them of the same rights we enjoy, but at the same time we're not mixing up God's message. In fact, we're living out all the truths that God intended us to live out--the truth of compassion and charity and loving kindness to all human beings, even sinners, even our enemies, just as much as the truth about homosexuality. What do you think?
Posted by: kristin at February 12, 2008 04:03 PMSoapbox Girl - I'm impressed! You should write a book. I live in a very liberal state and work with many homosexuals. This is a very interesting subject to me. I'll watch anxiously for this blog owner's post on her opinion.
Posted by: Soapbox Man at February 12, 2008 06:20 PM